Would you let Michael Jackson babysit your children? Or would you be way too paranoid to let him do it?
Answers:
You people are sick. Michael is a friend of mine and my husbands. He would not and could not hurt a child. He did not pay the second family off. They made sure of it. If you followed any of that then you would have heard the lie after lie and the contradictions that the second family made in court. It was ridiculous. Everyone I know says that they wouldn't leave their children with him just to be on the safe side. And I agree. I mean, what was the second mother thinking that she would just leave her child with him after the accusations from the first family. I know I would not just drop my child off to stay the night or week or anything else with someone who was in the media being called a child molester. And if you would then you are making your child's bed that they will have to lie in for the rest of their lives. I wouldn't even call it the molesters fault. It would be yours. People just need to let this case be. He PROVED himself innocent and that second family just proved to the whole world that there are money hungry greedy people out there that make everyone including you and I look bad. It is very sad. As for him hanging his child over the balcony, that was because people wanted to see him. Michael is very self cautious about people seeing his families faces though. It is to keep them safe. He just wanted to show his baby off. He would never had hurt him.
Other Answers:
He's been accused TWICE of molesting children and got out of it TWICE because he paid off the families. Now he lives where, and why??
No, I would not let him in the same house with my kids.
He can live in peace as far as I am concerned, but I would never ever let him anywhere near my child, or anyone else's child I know. I wouldn't even let him near my cat!!
I wouldn't let Micheal Jackson babysit my pet snake. I think he is a sick pedophile, and his own children are in real serious danger, living with him.
I would never let him babysit my children.
I AM letting him live in peace. I don't think about him, talk about him, or bother him in any way. It's my prerogative who watches my kid. And I would never take my son anywhere near him.
Not in a million year. Although I totally agree that people should get over his case, but why would you want to let someone who is so creepy, who always covers his face and had so much plastic surgery that he doesn't have facial expression anymore to babysit the most important person in your life? He may be a very talented entertainer, but definitely not someone whom one should trust their children with. And remember he once held his baby out of the balcony?
Any sane person wouldn't let that pedophile anywhere near their child!!!
No I would not for two reasons
1 As a parent it is my duty to prevent harm as I can. In the case of babysitters I am responsible for trying to find a good caretaker for my child. I check out their friends and friends parents and if they are home when my kid is there etc. If it seems questionable I err on the side of caution. This man has a caution flag draped all over him.
2 I would not feel comfortable having Mr Jackson in that position because it is yet another risk he does not need to take. If he were proven as innocent and pure as the driven snow he would still take a huge amount of flack for that close and unsupervised contact with children that are not closely associated with him. It is not a risk I would feel comfortable with for his best interest or the attention it could bring to all parties.
I would allow my child to go to Michael Jackson's home, but I have a daughter...not a son. I think he gets a bum wrap for being nice to children. People nowadays are too greedy and will do anything for money.
I would let him baby-sit my child because who's to say that all of those stories about him are true? We as the public only hear what the news media wants us to. We haven't walked in his shoes. I don't care how much "evidence" they claim they have, if you weren't there in person to see him actually doing these things to children, then you have no real proof. So I don't think people should be so quick to judge others. Did anyone ever stop to think that he might be in hiding BECAUSE of the simple fact that he would like to get away from all the media? I think it is sad how people will not let him get on with his life like a normal human being should. And no matter what way you look at it, Michael Jackson will ALWAYS be a legend, so no matter what we say about him in the privacy of our own homes, it does not change that fact.
Source(s):
my opinion
No but it's not because of the rumors it's cause I only let family babysit my kids!
We Love You Michael!!!!
yes, I would let him to babysit my children.
Yeah i will love him to stay with my children cos I'm not one to be fooled by Hungry stupid media who are always looking for celebrities to pull down and fabricate lies just to sell to the gullible public
I would be just fine with Michael Jackson keeping. My kids or grand
Kids. If they could prove any of the allegations, He would not have
his children. The D.A. Had a hard on for Michael.
Every one needs to back off of Michael And O.J.
One more thing I am a white person.
Source(s):
opinion
More Questions & Answers...
- how do I get my 7 year old son to listen to me?
- To the bottle feeding bashers!?
- how can i know if my child is really my child. is dna the most reliable way?
- do think is justified 2 hate ur mother 4 leaving u at a very young age 4 nice tym.?
- baby and Baysitter?
- What do I do?