Want to adopt internationally but are $2000 below pov. guidelines. Can we prove ability by using assets?
Answers: I'd recommend adopt through your state's foster care system instead. It's free, the income restrictions only consist of making sure you can remuneration your bills (which you can), and adopting internationally isn't a viable way to assistance kids in other countries. They need to be capable of stay where they are, with those they know and love, surrounded by their own history, culture, family, homeland...they just obligation food in their tummies and a roof over their heads...and their own kinfolk. The kids in the USA, in foster guardianship, are the ones who need new family. However, if it's your desire to help kids in other countries, and adoption be just a means to an run out, I'd recommend giving the money you would have spent on adoption to a worthy charity in the country of your choice. That would facilitate children in foreign countries far more than taking them away from everything they know and love to be raised by strangers. (Read blogs written by trans tribal adoptees if you don't believe me.) It's wonderful that you want to help out - you just enjoy to know the right way to do it, and international adoption isn't always the best route for the kids.
Yes, assets such as definite estate would count, but going by what you describe, you would not likely be a candidate for adoption. You can indeed try though. A bonus is never considered guaranteed income unless there is a contract guaranteeing it.
My friends were competent to adopt with a low income, but they were not below the poverty stripe, had significant cash match AND they had significant amounts of debt-free real estate, some glibly saleable.
I am fairly sure that you can use your assets. I'd recommend contacting an international adoption agency, however. Just to be sure. The rules change adjectives of the time. The only reason surrounded by 99.9% of adoptions is that the birth parents are poor as well. Many come from loving homes but gain talked into giving up a child for a bit of money. Some adoptive parents won't agree with me but its true. I agree beside you. Money shouldn't be a factor and if that was the case several children in 3rd world countries would n't be getting talked into giving up their children. Read give or take a few Guatemala and how over 2/3 the children adopted by US citizens were done pretty much below the table. A facilitator and his family were kill recently by a villiage of 200 people because they be so agressive and lying to young mothers. Look it up on the web. Solola, Guate. I consider anyone that has adopted from this country owes it to their child, to find out the truth. As sick as it is, US priests be even taking children from this country and molesting them. Thats how it came to US gov't knowlege.
I personally regard as adoption is a gift but it has to stop when it become barter.
Seems to me, you got it together, but there is in recent times a little bit of red tape to receive through. Maybe this year you won't be below poverty level with your husbands bonus coming surrounded by and all. If not, I'm not sure what to say, purely wanted to comment because it sounded interesting after I read it. Good Luck!
PS. How could you afford passive solar if your below poverty? Isn't that expensive? Maybe you should bring a look at net worth when considering your financial situation for adoption. Hook up with a well-mannered accountant and see what he says.
More Questions...